NQ1965
PR Elite
I should be out riding but I'm working today so I got time to stew on these things.
I see all these thread post on tracks, track layouts, track prep or lack-of, and jumps. Does anyone ever stop to think about how motocross tracks have evolved and has it really gotten better? And I didn't say "or worse" because if people really thought it has gotten worse then we would go back the other way, right?
I'm a late bloomer and didn't get to ride tracks really "back in the day", but I do enjoy old photos and moto movies. It is very plain to see that the tracks were significantly different.
Back then did riders complain about track flow and that they couldn't quite get up to mach 6, or jump 100' doubles, or that this section or that is stupid, or that it's not cut deep, or that because it's too hard pack, or not enough lines or ruts?
I think I actually would like to ride some of those old style tracks here and there, with lots of hairy, brutally rough sections that don't flow well and cause congestion and a fair amount of skill to maneuver.
All this being said, I do like a deep cut moist track, deep berms, braking and accelleration bumps. But like variety as well. It's probably why GP courses are so much fun, not too much man made about them other than course layout.
Now I have spotted some of this in the videos of some current national tracks, so I'm not saying it don't exist. Looks like Unadilla has some pretty ugly sections. But don't see any of this at local tracks. It's as though a track today has to meet all of these current requirements to be any good and popular?
I see all these thread post on tracks, track layouts, track prep or lack-of, and jumps. Does anyone ever stop to think about how motocross tracks have evolved and has it really gotten better? And I didn't say "or worse" because if people really thought it has gotten worse then we would go back the other way, right?
I'm a late bloomer and didn't get to ride tracks really "back in the day", but I do enjoy old photos and moto movies. It is very plain to see that the tracks were significantly different.
Back then did riders complain about track flow and that they couldn't quite get up to mach 6, or jump 100' doubles, or that this section or that is stupid, or that it's not cut deep, or that because it's too hard pack, or not enough lines or ruts?
I think I actually would like to ride some of those old style tracks here and there, with lots of hairy, brutally rough sections that don't flow well and cause congestion and a fair amount of skill to maneuver.
All this being said, I do like a deep cut moist track, deep berms, braking and accelleration bumps. But like variety as well. It's probably why GP courses are so much fun, not too much man made about them other than course layout.
Now I have spotted some of this in the videos of some current national tracks, so I'm not saying it don't exist. Looks like Unadilla has some pretty ugly sections. But don't see any of this at local tracks. It's as though a track today has to meet all of these current requirements to be any good and popular?