Jason and Tina, and the rest of the crew did a great job yesterday with what was all on their plate. Thank you guys.
But, i'm chiming in on the quad vs. bike drama. What successful track/race has bikes and quads race on the same day? None that i've been to. Me personally, i'm all for eliminating quads. Its sucks to say because i have friends that race quads, but at the same time, look at what it does to our tracks and our riders. Most of our local guys only have smooth glassy tracks to ride, they get to nationals where no quads are at, and they struggle.
Practice saturday morning at Malvern was the best i've ever seen and ridden the track. All the hard work didnt go unnoticed. Until quads blew all the sand off and it was nice and smooth and hard. I feel bad that Jason and his crew worked that hard, almost for nothing. I would have loved to see how the track woulda shaped up if quads didn't go out.
Plus having to prep the track after practice for quads, then after them for bikes..? If quads were eliminated from racing on the same day, that would eliminate at least 2 sessions of track prep. I mean, do you hear guys complaining about Lorettas being too rough to ride?
Also, why is there talk about eliminating the 50's? In my opinion, racing 50's is more "true motocross" than racing quads.
I could go on and on about this subject. Touchy, like i said, cause we all know someone that rides a quad that we are friends with. But just look at the numbers of bikes vs quads...